Cite the source, or don't publish the claim
Every factual statement about a motif meaning, protocol or historical claim must be traceable to a published source — an ethnographic monograph, a peer-reviewed article, or a museum catalogue. Where a claim rests on a single source, we say so in-line. Where sources disagree, we present the disagreement rather than pick a side.
Attribute to a named culture, not to a pan-Polynesian blur
We do not use "tribal" as a category. Every motif, photo and page is tagged to a named tradition — Sāmoan, Māori, Marquesan, Hawaiian, Tahitian, Tongan, Cook Islands, Rapa Nui or Fijian — and where a motif crosses traditions we describe each variant separately with its own citation.
Creative Commons and public-domain imagery only
Every gallery photograph is sourced from Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons licence or the public domain. Each image card carries the photographer, licence code and the Wikimedia source URL. We do not scrape studio portfolios, social media, or private collections.
Sacred, initiation-only and lineage-specific marks are documented as heritage
The pe'a, moko kauae, clan-specific enata rows, family ʻaumakua and equivalent designs are recorded on the site so readers can recognise them. They are not presented as tattoo inspiration, and each relevant page states this.
Corrections are made in public
When something is wrong, we update the page and add a dated correction note. Readers can submit corrections through the contact form. Trivial fixes (typos, broken links) are made silently; substantive changes are logged on the page.
No claims about people or lineages without published evidence
We do not name individual artists, teachers, consultants or reviewers on this site unless we can point to a published, verifiable source for the association. This includes any claim of affiliation with named institutions or research collectives.